![]() The pure.css framework for basic grids links added in the HTML files.The pure.css framework for non-responsive form link is add in the HTML files.The pure.css framework for responsive form link is add in the HTML files.The pure.css responsive framework for button links is add in the HTML files.The pure.css responsive framework for the base link is add in the HTML files.The pure.css alternate CDNs file for the responsive framework is add in the HTML files.The pure.css non-responsive framework link is adding in the HTML files.The pure.css responsive framework link is adding to the HTML files.These responsive and non-responsive links are below. There are two pure.css links in the framework. The pure.css is easy and user friendly because this framework does not require any installation.The pure.css keeps steady or constant colors and shades across the many platforms.The pure.css has prebuilt main elements like buttons, dropdown menu, forms, grids, and tables.The pure.css is not dependent on any JavaScript and jQuery library but the design is flat and minimum modules requirements.The pure.css not only for responsive framework but also non-responsive module available in the framework.The pure.css is a minimum look with easy and one-click customize using skin builder.The pure.css is helping to remove the cross-browser compatibility issue because of the Normalize.css base.The pur.css is necessary for websites to fit easily layout and elements on all screen size devices and especially on mobile.The pure.css is a tiny and lightweight framework and the file size is less than 4.8KB with the zipped file.And, has extensive availability of pre-made media queries. As a mobile-first library - it is an absolute delight to work with. In practice, this converts to syntax that is both easy to understand, but also easy to style yourself. The mission statement for the Pure.css library is lovely, "Include only the absolutely necessary configuration to reduce cascading overhead.". When you don't have a thousand different classes depending on one another, it's much easier to add custom CSS snippets you find in tutorials or on sites like CodePen. Last but not least, it's a lot easier to add custom CSS to a small framework base because of no class interference. In particular, if you're just starting out with styling things yourself - a lightweight framework helps you to understand how the design comes together on a barebones level.Īnd not needing to depend on JavaScript goes a long way, too. All without requiring me to do code gymnastics to get the design working across multiple devices.Īdditionally, a smaller framework has a much more forgiving learning curve. In fact, Tailwind CSS's uncompressed bundle size is 3.5Mb! The main advantages of lightweight frameworksĪpart from direct improvements in performance, what are some other reasons to use smaller CSS frameworks? Personally, I love the idea of using a framework that gives me quick access to pre-defined layouts and additional style components. But, out of the box, a framework like Tailwind CSS or Bootstrap is not intended to be minimal or lightweight by default. It is typically possible to reduce the size of the bigger frameworks to something much more modest. This bundle size example is relevant in the context of fetching the framework directly through a CDN. I don't need to get caught up with rules and design options that I will never use in practice.Īnd as I said earlier, bundle size for modern frameworks can be absurdly high. ![]() Update: The new Almanac report shows that this number has kept rising from 2021 to 2022.įor me, a lightweight CSS framework gives me the tools to create my main containers, assign a few elements to them, and then I can focus on custom styling if I need it. ![]() The average size for a webpage today is around 2.5Mb once all the JavaScript has finished rendering. I think one of the trends happening in modern web dev right now is that developers simply don't care about the page size of their final designs. For a simple project - portfolio, blog, resume pages - a framework that has a bundle size of 50kb+ seems a bit overkill. They are all incredible frameworks for building complex and in-depth layout structures.īut, generally speaking, such frameworks are intended for projects where the design transpires across multiple pages. When someone mentions the phrase CSS frameworks, for a lot of people, the first thing that comes to mind is Bootstrap, Tailwind CSS, or Semantic UI. The main advantages of lightweight frameworks. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |